(Ed. note: We posted this review last week, but since the show debuts tonight, we thought we'd give you another look...)
I've seen the first episode of "Private Practice," and let me say this: it
was good.
Okay, some of it was good, because when it was good, it was very
good. But there were rough spots, and when those were bad, they were very bad. So
the question these days really is this: "Private Practice" - redheaded
step-child of the season, or the smash hit that we hoped for at first?
It won't be the critics who'll decide, and it
won't be the fans. It won't be the producers, the writers, or the
cast. It'll be one person, and one person alone: Shonda Rhimes.
The success of "Private Practice," debuting Sept. 26 on ABC, rests entirely on Shonda's
shoulders, and three years ago that would've been a good thing. You
know, before the crash-and-burn that was this past season of "Grey's."
From the penitent interviews Shonda has been giving, it seems like
she's finally got the message: You can only push the characters so far
before they just become impossible to believe - and, worse, relate to.
When Meredith says, "Seriously?" the answer shouldn't be, "No."
This "Seriously?" problem with "Grey's Anatomy" last season was what
pissed off fans during the spinoff episode for "Private Practice" last
season. The talking elevator was hard to swallow, but at least it was
a hard-to-swallow moment in the plot. The slo-mo gawking as their dripping,
muscular surfer-boy receptionist walked in from lunch, the
sleeping-around of the surrogate mother - those were hard-to-swallow character points. And in a show from Shonda Rhimes, the woman who
single-handedly brought decent character development back to network
TV, that's unforgivable.
So the question is: did the first real episode, with the
full power of its own crew, producers, and writers, manage to do better?
(Spoilers lie ahead, so proceed at your own risk!)